Co-parenting and Boundaries in It Starts with Us
Defining the Thematic Claim
In It Starts with Us, the theme of co-parenting and boundaries shows that surviving domestic abuse does not end with divorce. The survivor must continually enforce limits to protect both herself and her child, even as the ex-partner uses manipulation, jealousy, and the shared bond of parenthood to test those limits. The novel argues that effective co-parenting after abuse is not about cooperation on equal terms—it is a structured, often painful process where safety takes precedence over harmony, and where the survivor’s support network becomes essential.
Lily’s primary motivation throughout the story is to shield her daughter Emerson from the violence she herself endured. Yet she also wants Emerson to have a relationship with her father. This tension forces Lily to negotiate a fragile middle ground: day visits, no overnights, and constant vigilance. The boundaries she sets are not static; they evolve as Ryle’s behavior shifts and as Lily gains strength from those around her.
Tracing the Theme Across the Plot
Part One: Lily’s Initial Compromise and Fear
In Chapter Two, Lily reflects on the custody arrangement she struck with Ryle after their divorce. She chose not to pursue sole custody through the courts because, as her lawyer warned, a successful father with no record is unlikely to lose visitation rights. Instead, Lily accepted a compromise: day visits for the first few years, with Emerson never staying overnight. She tells herself that this is the “lesser of two evils,” but the arrangement depends on Ryle’s cooperation, which he gives conditionally—he still believes he can win her back.
Lily’s internal monologue reveals the constant fear that any move toward independence—especially reconnecting with Atlas Corrigan—will provoke Ryle’s jealousy and destabilize the fragile peace. She admits that Ryle’s potential reactions still occupy a wall in her thoughts, showing how boundaries are not just external agreements but internal disciplines. Her list of reminders—the seven items cataloguing Ryle’s abuse—becomes a touchstone she returns to whenever guilt or doubt creeps in. That list is her boundary with herself, preventing her from romanticizing the past.
Part Two: The Intervention at Allysa’s Home
By Chapter Thirty-Two, Ryle’s behavior has escalated. After he pins Lily against a door and sends threatening texts, she decides to confront him with the support of his sister Allysa and brother-in-law Marshall. The setting matters: Allysa’s home, with Ryle’s mother present in another room, creates a safe, supervised environment. Lily states her requirements: Ryle must undergo anger management, and his visits with Emerson must be supervised by Allysa or Marshall until he proves he can control his temper.
Ryle initially resists, but the united front of his own family forces him to comply. Lily’s boundaries here are not negotiable—she even threatens to sell everything to fight him in court if necessary. This scene demonstrates that effective co-parenting boundaries often require collective enforcement. Lily’s shield collapses afterward, and she weeps from relief, but the boundaries hold. The chapter ends with Ryle agreeing to supervised visits on Thursday—a small but significant victory.
Part Three: Atlas’s Advocacy and Parallel Boundary-Setting
Atlas plays a crucial role in reinforcing these boundaries, though he is not a parent to Emerson. In Chapter Twenty-Seven, he confronts Ryle directly, insisting that Ryle’s anger and fists are the reason his marriage ended, not Atlas. Atlas frames co-parenting as a team effort, telling Ryle, “A team is the only thing people should be when kids are involved.” He challenges Ryle to accept that Lily and Emerson deserve a good life and that his cooperation is necessary for their happiness.
Atlas’s own experience with boundary-setting is illustrated in Chapter Thirty-Three, when he meets his mother, Sutton, to discuss custody of his younger brother Josh. Atlas does not demand that Sutton disappear; instead, he asks her to show up once a week for dinner and be genuinely interested in Josh. He offers her an “opportunity to be a better mother,” enforcing a boundary that protects Josh while leaving the door open for connection. This parallel shows that boundaries in co-parenting—whether for a child or a sibling—are not about rejection but about structuring relationships in a way that prioritizes safety and emotional health.
Character and Symbol Connections
The character of Ryle Kincaid embodies the challenge of co-parenting with an abuser. His cooperation is always conditional on the hope of reconciliation, which makes him unreliable. Lily’s boundaries must therefore be rigid enough to withstand his manipulation. Allysa and Marshall (note: Marshall is Allysa’s husband, not Theo—the internal link for Theo is for Atlas’s friend; we have a character page for Theo but Marshall is not listed separately; we can reference Allysa and Marshall as they appear in evidence) act as enforcers, providing the supervision that Lily cannot do alone. Lily Bloom herself evolves from a woman who questions her decisions to one who states her terms without apology.
Symbols reinforce these themes. The list of abuse that Lily keeps in her jewelry box is a boundary object—it reminds her why she cannot relent. The heart-shaped shoulder tattoo covers the scar from Ryle’s bite, a permanent mark of violence that Lily transforms into a symbol of survival. Even the family tree drawing (likely referenced in the novel) represents the complicated extended family that Emerson will grow up in—a web of relationships that must be managed with care.
Addressing Complexity and Contradiction
The novel resists a simplistic view of co-parenting. Lily sometimes wonders if she is being too hard on Ryle, and she feels a “twinge of guilt” when he gives in. The narrative does not pretend that boundaries are easy or that they always work perfectly. Ryle’s manipulation—gaslighting, unwanted flirtation, threats—persists even after the intervention. Atlas’s heartfelt plea in Chapter Twenty-Seven leads to a moment of understanding, but Ryle still walks away saying, “When things don’t work out… I’m not picking up the pieces.” The tension is never fully resolved; it is managed.
Furthermore, the boundary that protects Emerson (no overnights until she can talk) is based on Lily’s fear that her daughter cannot report abuse. This is a painful necessity, but it also limits Emerson’s bond with her father and creates resentment. Lily acknowledges that there is no perfect solution—only the choice of “the lesser of two evils.” The novel thus presents co-parenting after abuse as an ongoing practice of courage and compromise, where the survivor must constantly reaffirm her own worth and her child’s safety.
Study Questions and Answers
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| 1. How does Lily’s list of reminders help her maintain boundaries in her co-parenting relationship with Ryle? | The list catalogues specific acts of abuse, such as the slap, the push down stairs, and the bite. When Lily feels guilt or doubts her decision to enforce limits, she reads the list to ground herself in reality. It acts as an external memory that counteracts Ryle’s gaslighting and her own tendency to minimize the abuse. |
| 2. In Chapter Thirty-Two, why is the intervention at Allysa’s home effective in getting Ryle to agree to anger management? | The intervention succeeds because it is not a private confrontation between Lily and Ryle. Allysa and Marshall present a united front in a neutral, supervised space. Ryle is aware that his mother is nearby, which keeps his behavior in check. The social pressure and the clear ultimatum (anger management or fractured family) leave him with no viable alternative. |
| 3. Compare the way Atlas sets boundaries with his mother Sutton to the way Lily sets boundaries with Ryle. What do both situations reveal about protecting loved ones? | Atlas does not demand that Sutton disappear; he asks her to sign over legal custody of Josh while still welcoming her to weekly dinners. Lily also limits Ryle’s access to Emerson but allows supervised visits. Both prioritize the child’s emotional safety over the adult’s convenience. The parallel shows that boundaries can be both firm and compassionate, aiming to preserve a relationship while preventing harm. |
| 4. How does Ryle’s conditional cooperation (based on hope of reconciliation) complicate the co-parenting arrangement? | Ryle agrees to the day-visit arrangement partly because he believes he can win Lily back through good behavior. This means his cooperation is not genuine respect for boundaries—it is a tactic. When Lily begins dating Atlas, Ryle’s jealousy threatens to undo the agreement. The complication is that any boundary founded on the other person’s self-interest is fragile; true co-parenting requires the abusive partner to accept the finality of the divorce. |
| 5. What role do friends and family play in enforcing boundaries in the novel? Use examples from the text. | Allysa and Marshall serve as physical and emotional support for Lily. They provide a safe location for visits, witness Ryle’s behavior, and openly side with Lily during the intervention. Atlas also helps by delivering a calm, rational message to Ryle in Chapter Twenty-Seven, acting as an intermediary who can say things that Lily cannot. The novel suggests that survivors of abuse often need a network to hold boundaries that are too heavy to maintain alone. |