Chapter summaries The Buffalo Hunter Hunter Stephen Graham Jones

Chapter 5: The Absolution of Three-Persons — Summary and Analysis

⚠️ Spoiler Warning: This guide contains detailed spoilers for the entire novel. Proceed only if you've finished reading or are comfortable knowing the plot.


Summary

On April 3, 1912, the pastor records another body—called a “hump” by locals—being found south of Miles City. Sheriff Lacy Doyle invites the pastor to accompany the retrieval party. When they arrive, the corpse is facedown, its skin removed from the torso, upper arms, and thighs. The man’s face is painted in bisected yellow and black, exactly the pattern Good Stab described for the buffalo his story claimed were blessed by passing Indians.

The party notes the absence of scavenger birds and coyotes. Livinius Clarkson recounts an old buffalo hunter’s tale: twice, Indians stealthily skinned a single buffalo from a kill, painted its face, and left the meat. The pattern matches the present corpse. To keep the dog from refusing its task, Doyle spreads bacon grease on the dead man’s buttocks; the dog eats.

Back home, the pastor discovers his fingers stained black and yellow from touching the painted skin—the paint transfers to the page as he writes. Then, while sorting the offering plate, he finds two brass buttons impaled on a single porcupine quill. He drops the plate.


Key Events

  • The pastor is summoned to a skinned body and rides out with Sheriff Doyle and deputies.
  • No scavengers or coyotes approach the corpse, a notable absence.
  • Livinius Clarkson tells a story about an old buffalo hunter who twice lost a skinned, painted buffalo to Indians.
  • The dead man’s face is painted black on the left, yellow on the right—identical to the buffalo story.
  • Doyle uses bacon grease to attract the dog, which then eats from the corpse.
  • The pastor’s fingers become stained with the same yellow and black paint.
  • While sorting the offering plate, the pastor finds two brass buttons stuck on a porcupine quill.

Character Development

The Pastor (Three-Persons):
His journal reveals deep personal guilt and self-flagellation. He confesses to retrieving an old letter he had written decades earlier, intending to burn it, and sees Good Stab’s presence as a possible judgment. His attempts at self-denial with Lorelei Baker’s cake show a struggle between ascetic duty and human weakness. He is increasingly infected by Good Stab’s narrative—the story now colors how he interprets the real-world death.

Good Stab (offstage):
Though not present in this chapter, Good Stab’s storytelling dominates the pastor’s thoughts. The pastor recognizes that the tale is fabricated in places (e.g., the Hotchkiss Mountain Gun vs. grapeshot), yet he is drawn in. Good Stab’s “confession” is now entangled with the pastor’s own.

Livinius Clarkson:
A garrulous, tobacco-spitting storyteller. His anecdote about the buffalo hunter provides a historical (and possibly mythical) precedent for the painted bodies. He is a local authority on frontier lore.

Sheriff Lacy Doyle:
Practical and grim. He includes the pastor out of courtesy, but his main focus is managing the scene and the dog.


Themes, Symbols, or Motifs

Absolution and Confession:
The chapter’s title “The Absolution of Three-Persons” ties to both the pastor’s own need for absolution and the ritual of confession. The pastor “absolves” Lorelei Baker for her cake and Good Stab for his yet-unrevealed trespass, but he struggles to absolve himself.

Narrative Infection:
The pastor repeatedly notes how Good Stab’s story colors his perceptions—expecting soldiers in the tracks, seeing beaver in a black smudge. The story is “ambushing” his everyday life. This motif highlights the power of oral narrative to reshape reality.

Colonial Violence and Signatures:
The painted face on the corpse mirrors the buffalo story. This suggests the killings are a deliberate message, a signature left by “hostiles.” The chapter raises the question of motive: is this revenge for a specific wrong or a general complaint?

The Porcupine Quill Offering:
Two brass buttons impaled on a quill in the offering plate echoes the past—buttons from military jackets, possibly from the Marias Massacre era. This object is both a gift and a challenge, linking the church to the violence Good Stab describes.


Why This Chapter Matters

Chapter 5 bridges Good Stab’s historical story—the massacre of eleven men on the Mullan Road—and the present-day murders in Miles City. The discovery of a skinned, painted corpse confirms that the pattern described in the tale is being replicated. The pastor’s growing obsession with the narrative and his own guilt sets the stage for a deeper entanglement. The brass-button offering adds a ceremonial, perhaps accusatory, dimension to the church’s role. This chapter establishes the novel’s central mystery: who is leaving these bodies, and what does Good Stab know?


Study Questions and Answers

1. Why does the pastor mention that there were no scavenger birds or coyotes near the corpse?
The absence of scavengers suggests the body was placed or treated in a way that repelled animals, or that it was too fresh for them to have found it. The pastor connects this oddity to Good Stab’s story, wondering if the killer knows how to avoid animal attention.

2. What is the significance of the two brass buttons on a porcupine quill in the offering plate?
The buttons appear to be from a military jacket, possibly from the era of the Marias Massacre (1870). Impaled on a porcupine quill—a traditional Native American craft material—the offering seems to be a deliberate message left by someone (perhaps Good Stab) linking the church to past violence. It shocks the pastor and deepens his guilt.

3. How does Livinius Clarkson’s buffalo-hunter story parallel the present-day murder?
In Clarkson’s story, Indians silently skinned and painted a single buffalo from a hunter’s kill, leaving the meat but taking the hide. The present corpse is also skinned and painted in the same bisected manner. This parallel suggests that the killings are a ritualized act of defiance or reclaiming, perhaps in response to the historical slaughter of buffalo and people.


Navigation