Symbols The Devils Joe Abercrombie

The Split Coin Pendant: Fragmented Identity in The Devils

What Is the Split Coin Pendant?

The split coin pendant is a physical half-coin that serves as one of the primary proofs identifying Alex—a streetwise swindler—as Princess Alexia Pyrogennetos, the long-lost heir to the Serpent Throne of Troy. In Chapter 6 of The Devils, Cardinal Bock mentions the “half-coin” alongside Alex’s birthmark and her uncle’s testimony as evidence supporting her claimed identity. The coin itself is never described in great detail, but its function is clear: a broken token that must match a missing half, presumably held by officials in Troy, to confirm the claimant’s legitimacy.

Unlike a typical inheritance trinket, the split coin carries the grime of Alex’s former life. It is not a polished heirloom but a pragmatic object—something that could be hidden, secreted away, or slipped between floorboards. Alex herself has a history of stashing coins on her person; in Chapter 45 she jokes about only putting gold “up there these days,” underscoring her habit of using money as a survival tool. The split coin thus bridges two worlds: the gutter and the throne.

Where Does the Pendulum Appear?

The split coin is introduced in Chapter 6 (“Born in the Flame”) during a magical verification ritual in the Celestial Palace. Cardinal Bock lists the half-coin as one of three proofs, and the scene emphasizes the bureaucratic steps required to authenticate a royal heir. Beyond that direct mention, the coin’s symbolic presence echoes throughout the narrative as Alex is constantly reminded of her borrowed status. Even when she is not physically holding the pendant, the identity it represents—and the doubt it cannot fully erase—weighs on her.

Later, in Chapter 45 (“Good Givers”), Alex distributes coins to a traveling player troupe, demonstrating her openness with money now that she has access to royal funds. While this is not the same split coin, the act reinforces her relationship with currency as a marker of trust, deception, and identity. The split coin is the origin point of her transformation from thief to princess, but it also remains a source of anxiety: proof can be faked, and Alex knows that better than most.

How Its Meaning Shifts

Initially, the split coin is a simple device of identity verification—a way for the Church and the Empire of Troy to confirm Alex is who she claims to be. But as the story progresses, the coin becomes a symbol of fractured selfhood. Alex is literally split: she must perform the role of Princess Alexia while suppressing the thief “Alex.” The half-coin represents that internal division, a constant reminder that she is never fully one person or the other.

Later, the pendant also comes to stand for the randomness of fate. Alex did not earn her place; she was lucky to have a birthmark and a coin that happened to match. The object’s arbitrary power—a mere piece of metal deciding her worth—mirrors the theme of survival and pragmatism that runs through The Devils. Characters cling to whatever identity gets them through the day, and the split coin is the ultimate symbol of that opportunism.

Character and Theme Connections

Alex (Princess Alexia)

The split coin is her symbol more than anyone else’s. It ties directly to her internal conflict: Is she the street rat who lied her way upward, or the legitimate heir? She carries the weight of the uncertainty. In Chapter 6, she thinks, “Any moment now they’d realise that instead of a long-lost princess they’d found themselves a piece of shit.” The coin cannot erase her self-doubt; it only makes the lie plausible enough to keep going.

Brother Eduardo Diaz

As a monk who has also abandoned his original identity, Diaz shares Alex’s unease with the roles imposed on him. He is appointed vicar of the Chapel of the Holy Expediency in Chapter 3, a post that forces him to compromise his faith. The split coin’s theme of identity and deception connects to Diaz’s journey: both he and Alex must wear masks to survive in a corrupt Church.

Duke Michael of Nicaea

He is the one who announces Alex’s identity in Chapter 2, effectively using the coin as a narrative lever to reshape her life. Duke Michael’s own role as a loyalist who might have manipulated events to find a puppet heir adds a layer of suspicion. The coin could be a prop in a larger political game.

The Chapel of the Holy Expediency

Cardinal Zizka’s secret thirteenth chapel operates on the principle that to fight devils one must sometimes use devils. The split coin, as a tool of deception that serves the “truth” of Alex’s claim, fits precisely into this moral compromise. The Church itself relies on half-truths and pragmatic fictions.

Themes

  • Religious Hypocrisy and Moral Compromise: The coin is used to install a ruler in a scheme approved by the Church, highlighting how institutions wield symbols for political ends.
  • Identity and Deception: Alex’s performance of royalty directly involves the coin as a prop that must be believed.
  • Survival and Pragmatism: Having the coin is a matter of life and death; without it Alex remains a debtor at the mercy of Bostro.
  • Redemption and Guilt: Alex never fully sheds her past. The half-coin reminds her (and the reader) that her redemption is built on a lie.
  • Power and Corruption: The coin is a tool for acquiring imperial power, and its split nature foreshadows the fractured rule that follows.

Study Questions with Answers

1. How does the split coin pendant function both as a plot device and as a symbol?

Answer: As a plot device, the coin proves Alex’s identity, enabling her to ascend to the Serpent Throne. Symbolically, the half-coin represents Alex’s fractured identity—she is split between thief and princess—and the randomness of fate, since her life changes merely because a piece of metal matches. The coin also critiques the Church’s willingness to use deceptive means for divine ends.

2. In what ways does the split coin connect to the theme of moral compromise in the novel?

Answer: The Church accepts the half-coin as sufficient proof despite knowing Alex’s criminal past. This mirrors the Chapel of the Holy Expediency’s ethos: ends justify means. Just as the Church uses devils to fight devils, it uses a liar to secure the throne. The coin becomes a symbol of the institutional corruption that prioritizes political stability over absolute truth.

3. How does Alex’s attitude toward money in Chapter 45 relate to her relationship with the split coin?

Answer: In Chapter 45, Alex freely gives coins to players, remembering her own days of hiding money in her clothes. This generosity contrasts with her earlier hoarding instinct, showing she now has enough wealth to share. However, her joke about “gold up there” reveals she still sees currency as a tool for deception and survival. The split coin is the ultimate example: it is both her ticket to safety and a constant reminder of the lie she lives.

4. If the split coin had been lost or revealed as a forgery, how would the story’s themes change?

Answer: Without the coin, Alex could not prove her identity, and the plot would revert to a crime story rather than political intrigue. The themes of fate and identity would shift: instead of questioning whether she deserves her throne, the story would ask whether she deserves punishment for her past. The Church’s moral compromise would be moot, and the theme of redemption might pivot toward actual reform instead of performance.

Further Reading on the Novel’s Themes and Characters