Characters Goldenrod Maggie Smith

The Speaker as the Voice of Goldenrod

Overview of the Speaker

The speaker of Maggie Smith’s Goldenrod is the first-person consciousness that carries nearly every poem. She is not a character in a conventional narrative but a persona that blends the poet’s own voice with a crafted, reflective identity—a mother, a writer, a woman navigating the aftermath of divorce and the everyday weight of loss. The collection’s epigraph, a line from Forrest Gander—“… and then I outlived my life”—immediately establishes her as someone who has endured a rupture so profound that she now moves through a world that feels both familiar and foreign. Throughout the book, she observes, questions, and redefines her place in that world through encounters with nature, family, and language.

The Speaker’s Role in the Collection’s Arc

Goldenrod does not unfold as a linear plot, but the speaker’s emotional journey follows a distinct trajectory. Early poems such as “This Sort of Thing Happens All the Time” capture a state of disorientation: a suburban scene where familiar bird calls become unrecognizable, and the speaker wonders whether such dreamlike uncertainty is rare or constant. This disorientation echoes the epigraph’s sense of having outlived one’s life.

The middle of the collection confronts the end of a marriage directly. In “At the End of Our Marriage, in the Backyard,” the speaker describes letting the yard run wild—violets, dandelions, crabgrass—while she and her spouse “do nothing,” pretending the neglect is intentional. The untended yard becomes a metaphor for a relationship ending without confrontation. Later, in “After the Divorce, I Think of Something My Daughter Said About Mars,” the speaker uses her daughter’s scientific observation about irreversible travel to Mars to accept the permanence of divorce. By the final poems, a shift toward resilience and self-acceptance emerges. In “Walking the Dog,” she imagines seeing herself on the street and resolves to simply say, “Look, that’s me.” In “Invisible Architecture,” she discovers a hidden structure made of light, contradicting her earlier belief that space was empty—a metaphor for finding faith in an unseen order after loss.

Motivations and Traits Revealed Through Action

The speaker’s motivations are rooted in a need to understand, articulate, and bear witness—both to her own experience and to the world around her. She is driven by a desire to protect her children, to find meaning in nature, and to make sense of pain through language.

Her actions reveal humility and curiosity. In the title poem “Goldenrod,” she admits she is no botanist yet names the flower based on appearance. She asks forgiveness for a possible misidentification and offers to let the flower name her in return—a gesture that reverses the power dynamic of naming and signals a willingness to be defined by something outside herself. This act of surrender recurs throughout the collection.

In the kitchen, she lets a thought “prove” overnight like bread dough, checking in the morning to see if it has doubled. This patience underscores her trust in organic growth and creative incubation. When her son falls gravely ill (“Not Everything Is a Poem”), she refuses to turn his suffering into a tidy metaphor, insisting that some pain cannot be made poetic. This refusal shows her integrity and her commitment to truth over artifice.

Her maternal vigilance is another defining trait. In “Airplanes,” she watches her three-year-old son sleep in footed pajamas printed with smiling airplanes. She reflects that she was absent from family photographs that year yet present as a protective shadow who shielded his eyes whenever another mother’s Black son was shot. She corrects herself: people, not the year, commit the violence. This moment reveals her awareness of racial privilege and her fierce need to guard innocence.

The Speaker’s Relationships

The speaker’s most vital relationships are with her children. Her daughter and son appear frequently, often as sources of wisdom. In “At the End of My Marriage, I Think of Something My Daughter Said About Trees,” the daughter’s observation that the sky rushes in when a tree is cut down becomes a lens for reframing loss: the space left by the marriage is not a void but an opening for new possibilities. In “For My Next Trick,” the daughter asks where she was before birth and whether she will return to nothing. The speaker struggles to answer honestly, torn between the desire to provide comfort and her own uncertainty.

The speaker’s relationship with her ex-husband is present mostly through absence and metaphor. In “At the End of Our Marriage, in the Backyard,” they share a passive complicity in letting the yard go. In “Poem Beginning with a Line from Bashō,” she recalls his offhand remark that the destruction was “a long time coming.” The marriage is never named directly; instead, it is felt in the gaps.

Family history also shapes the speaker. In “Talk of Horses,” she fragments childhood memories—Avon lipsticks, cherry trees, a grandfather’s dazed third wife nicknamed “The Spun Pheasant.” She questions whether these pieces function as clues in a mystery, then asks if life itself is a mystery. This poem shows her grappling with the unreliability of memory and the effort to construct a coherent self from the past.

Key Decisions and Their Consequences

The speaker’s decisions are often small but consequential. Naming the goldenrod and then offering to be named by it transforms an act of labeling into an act of mutual recognition. Letting the backyard run wild becomes a passive decision that allows her to avoid direct confrontation but also to find beauty in decay: she and her family sit ankle-deep in weeds that they choose to call flowers.

Her decision to interpret her daughter’s words about trees as a metaphor for renewal rather than emptiness marks a turning point. It reframes grief as an opening, a shift that allows her to move toward acceptance. In “Walking the Dog,” she decides to see herself without the inner critic’s judgment. The poem ends with a simple statement: “Look, that’s me.” This self-recognition is a quiet triumph after the fragmentation of divorce.

The most consequential decision may be the one she makes in the final poem, “Wild.” She admits she has talked about loving the world without knowing how to do it. She redefines love not as sentiment but as radical self-surrender: she holds out her hand, feeding herself to the hungry future. This decision to offer herself—flawed, grieving, but present—becomes the collection’s final act of resilience.

Themes and Symbol Connections

The speaker embodies every major theme of Goldenrod. She is the lens through which survival after loss is examined, the mother whose love is both tender and fierce, the witness to memory’s fragility, and the poet who uses nature and language to make sense of experience. The field of goldenrod in the title poem becomes a mirror that reflects abundance and unity, but also the speaker’s own desire for connection. In “Threshold,” she redefines any open space as a door—an arch of entering and leaving—capturing the liminal state of living between past and future. Nature is never merely backdrop; it is a co-conspirator, a teacher, and sometimes a comfort.

For deeper connections, see our analyses of survival and resilience after loss, motherhood and parental love, memory and the past, nature as mirror and metaphor, and language, naming, and perception.

Questions and Answers About the Speaker

  1. Is the speaker meant to be Maggie Smith herself?
    The speaker shares many biographical details with the poet—divorce, motherhood, a life in Ohio—but the poems are crafted works. In a cento like those in the collection, the speaker explicitly borrows phrases from other writers, reminding readers that the voice is constructed. While the emotional core feels personal, the speaker is best understood as a persona that blends the poet’s lived experience with artistic shaping.

  2. How does the speaker view nature?
    She sees nature as both independent and responsive. In “Goldenrod,” she acknowledges that the flower exists “in spite of the words I use,” implying nature’s indifference to human language. Yet she also projects her own feelings onto the landscape, as in “Poor Sheep” where she questions whether the fog-covered mountains reflect her interior state. Nature is a mirror she cannot stop looking into, an interlocutor that both resists and invites meaning.

  3. What is the speaker’s approach to processing her divorce?
    She rarely names the divorce directly. Instead, she processes it through metaphor: the overgrown yard, the fallen tree, the irreversible journey to Mars. Her approach is indirect and cumulative. At the end of the marriage, she lets things decline without intervention. After the divorce, she accepts permanence through a child’s scientific explanation. The processing is not intellectual but embodied, woven into the fabric of daily life.

  4. How do the speaker’s children influence her perspective?
    Her children are often the catalysts for insight. The daughter’s comment about trees reframes loss as opportunity; the son’s inventive spelling note (“evrethenezgoonfin”) becomes a lesson in deciphering meaning. In “Planetarium in January,” the speaker forgets her daughter momentarily while lost in a star-house, then reconnects—a small lesson in the tension between inner life and caregiving. The children ground her in the present and offer unexpected wisdom.

  5. How does the speaker’s understanding of language evolve during the collection?
    Early in the book, she worries about the accuracy of naming: calling a flower goldenrod without certainty. Later, she delights in her son’s inventive spelling, finding meaning in phonetic approximations. In “Rose Has Hands,” autocorrect distorts her words, revealing how technology interferes with expression. By the end, she embraces language’s limits: “Not everything is a poem,” she insists. Language becomes less about precision and more about the attempt to reach toward something true, even when words fail.

For a discussion of how the speaker’s journey culminates, see the ending explained. For other reader questions, visit the questions and answers page.