Authenticity and Forgery: The Dual Threads of Art and Identity in Table for Two
The Thematic Claim: Imitation as a Mirror of Truth
In Table for Two, Amor Towles weaves a recurring tension between authentic creation and skillful imitation. The collection argues that forgery—whether of signatures, identities, or intentions—can paradoxically reveal deeper truths about artistry, human connection, and the self. Rather than presenting authenticity and forgery as simple opposites, Towles explores how the boundary between them blurs: a masterfully forged signature can express genuine artistic spirit, while a seemingly authentic life may be a performance. This theme pulses through stories ranging from revolutionary Russia to contemporary New York and Hollywood, linking characters who find themselves caught between who they are and who they pretend to be.
Tracing the Theme Across the Plot
1. The Art of Forgery in "The Ballad of Timothy Touchett"
The most explicit treatment of the theme appears in Timothy Touchett's story. A struggling novelist without life experience, Timothy discovers he possesses an uncanny ability to copy signatures. Under the tutelage of bookseller Mr. Pennybrook, he begins forging inscriptions from deceased authors into rare first editions. What begins as a modest sideline—signing for John Dos Passos—escalates into a masterful art form. Timothy studies not just calligraphy but the psychological state of each author at the moment of signing: Hemingway at war with himself, O'Hara battling alcoholism, Hammett in the throes of love. His forgeries become so precise that they fool dealers and collectors alike.
Yet the story complicates our judgment. Timothy develops a code: he will only forge signatures of dead authors, leaving the living to sign for themselves. The exception is Paul Auster, whose metafictional works—filled with doppelgängers and ghosts—make the author himself a fitting subject for imitation. Timothy's ethical boundary is porous but principled. When he forges the Cyrillic inscription for Anna Karenina, adding a paternal message from Tolstoy to his daughter, he spends weeks immersed in research, growing a beard in sympathy with Tolstoy's ascetic phase. Mr. Pennybrook, examining the result, sheds a genuine tear. The forgery is, in its way, a genuine act of artistic empathy.
But the illusion shatters when Paul Auster himself wanders into the shop, realizes his signature has been copied, and reports the crime. Detective Dawson finds the incriminating practice sheet matching the Anna Karenina inscription. Timothy is arrested, his artistic triumph undone by its own success. The story suggests that the very skill that made him a master forger also blinded him to the consequences—or perhaps made the consequences irrelevant. As the narrator wryly notes, the path of least resistance is the one rivers follow, and it has been celebrated by mystics. Towles invites us to see Timothy not as a simple criminal but as an artist who chose the wrong medium.
2. Genuine Patience in a World of Performance: "The Line"
The opening story, "The Line," shifts the theme to questions of identity and ideology. Pushkin, a contented peasant in Tsarist Russia, finds his life upended when his wife Irina becomes a fervent Bolshevik after a revolutionary speech. She insists they move to Moscow, where Pushkin fails at factory labor but unexpectedly discovers a talent for waiting in lines. His patience and kindness make him indispensable; he builds a network of line-waiters, adopts an orphan named Petya, and becomes a central figure in the new Soviet economy of scarcity.
Irina, meanwhile, performs the role of the committed revolutionary, but her ideology softens as she enjoys the fruits of Pushkin's success. Here, the forgery is ideological: Irina's revolutionary fervor is a costume she wears, while Pushkin's line-waiting is utterly genuine, even as it serves a system he may not believe in. When Pushkin helps a former painter, Sergei Litvinov, obtain an exit visa, the visa ends up in Pushkin's own name. The couple emigrates to New York, where Pushkin gives away nearly all their money. Irina storms off to find Russian-speaking workers and a revolutionary rally, while Pushkin follows an old man to a soup line and gladly joins its end, unchanged in spirit.
The symbol of the line-waiting becomes a foil for authentic existence. Pushkin does not pretend to be patient; he is patient. He does not fake generosity; he gives away everything. Even when his life is built on a counterfeit visa, his core self remains genuine. Irina, by contrast, performs ideology but cannot sustain it when comfort arrives. The story suggests that authenticity resides not in political labels but in the consistent practice of one's nature.
3. Fragmented Legacy and the Authenticity of Art: "The DiDomenico Fragment"
The novella-length "The DiDomenico Fragment" takes up the question of artistic authenticity through the lens of a Renaissance painting. Retired art expert Percy Skinner learns that a valuable Annunciation fragment once owned by his great-grandfather has resurfaced in the possession of his nephew Peter. The original painting was cut into four pieces by the great-grandfather to avoid selling it—each son received a quadrant. Now Percy schemes to profit by brokering a sale, manipulating family members and a tech billionaire to secure a finder's fee.
Here, the forgery is not of the painting itself but of family ties and professional ethics. Percy pretends to help his nephew while secretly aligning with the buyer. Yet his scheme fails: the billionaire beats him to the deal, and Percy loses the commission. In a surprising twist, he gains a permanent place at Peter's Thanksgiving table—a genuine family connection that his manipulative efforts had undermined.
The DiDomenico fragment symbolizes the fragmentation of authenticity itself. The Annunciation, a sonnet-like form with strict Renaissance conventions, was originally a unified masterpiece. Cutting it into four parts physically enacts the theme of division between authentic whole and partial imitation. Percy's quest to profit from the fragment mirrors the larger human desire to possess art without understanding it. Ultimately, the story suggests that failed ambition can lead to something more authentic: belonging.
4. Secret Recordings and Secret Selves: "The Bootlegger"
In "The Bootlegger," Mary Harkness recounts a 1996 Carnegie Hall season when her husband Tommy becomes obsessed with an older attendee, Arthur Fein, who secretly records performances. Tommy reports Fein to management and police; the older man confesses that he recorded the music for his bedridden wife. Remorseful, Tommy tracks Fein to his apartment to apologize. There, Fein's daughter Meredith angrily explains the harm: the recordings helped Fein grieve after his wife's death, but the shame of the accusation destroyed them and forced him to finally confront his loss.
The bootleg tape—a form of audio forgery—becomes a genuine expression of love and grief. Fein's act of recording is technically illegal but emotionally authentic. Tommy's initial outrage is based on a superficial view of propriety, while the deeper truth lies in Fein's devotion. Mary keeps the confiscated cassette as a private keepsake, never discussing the night again. This silence itself becomes a form of authenticity: some truths cannot be spoken, only preserved.
5. Reinvention as Performance: "Eve in Hollywood"
The collection's second half opens with "Eve in Hollywood," shifting the setting to the film capital and introducing a protagonist named Eve. While the chapter outline is brief, the context of Hollywood—a world built on illusion and performance—extends the theme. In a town where everyone is pretending to be someone else, authenticity becomes a rare commodity. Eve's journey suggests that reinvention can be either a forgery of the self or a genuine new beginning. The ambiguity remains unresolved, inviting readers to question whether a performed identity can ever be authentic.
Character and Symbol Connections
The theme unites characters across vastly different circumstances. Timothy Touchett is the purest illustration: he masters the art of making copies that are indistinguishable from originals. His skill is genuine; his product is fake. Pushkin lives an authentic life of patience and kindness within a system built on ideological pretense. Percy Skinner performs the role of the helpful uncle while plotting self-serving schemes, yet ends up with a real connection. Arthur Fein breaks rules out of love, and his bootleg recordings become remnants of genuine devotion.
Key symbols reinforce this web:
-
Forged signatures are the central device in Timothy's story. They represent the paradox of perfect imitation conveying artistic truth. The Tolstoy inscription is so good it brings Pennybrook to tears, yet it is a crime. Signatures are supposed to be the ultimate mark of personal authenticity, but here they become the vehicle for its opposite.
-
The line-waiting symbolizes the authentic self that persists despite external circumstances. Pushkin waits not as a performance but as a natural expression of his patience. The line is egalitarian and honest; it cannot be faked.
-
The DiDomenico fragment physically embodies the fragmentation of authenticity. The painting's division destroys its unity but creates new possibilities—each fragment carries meaning on its own. The symbol asks whether the whole or the part is more real.
-
Roller-skating appears in the outline as a symbol from unspecified stories. It likely represents movement, grace, and the effort required to maintain balance—perhaps a metaphor for the performance of authenticity itself, or the joy of genuine skill.
Complexity and Contradiction
Towles resists any simple moral condemnation of forgery. Timothy's forgeries are acts of artistic empathy; he studies authors so deeply that his copies become expressive of their inner lives. Mr. Pennybrook, a seasoned bookseller, cannot distinguish the fake from the real. Yet the law catches up, and Timothy's talent leads to his downfall. The story suggests that mastery of imitation does not exempt one from consequences, but neither does it diminish the artistry.
Similarly, Pushkin's authentic goodness thrives within a life built on a stolen visa and a marriage to an ideological performer. His patience is not a virtue he chooses; it is his nature. Irina's performance of revolution is not simply hypocritical; it reflects a genuine desire for meaning that she cannot sustain. The stories never reduce characters to mere frauds or saints.
The collection also suggests that modern life—especially in New York and Hollywood—demands a certain level of performance. The bank manager, the sommelier, the suave Smitty in "Hasta Luego"—all wear suits and play roles. Even the narrator of "The DiDomenico Fragment" addresses the "gentle reader" with theatrical formality. Forgery is not an aberration but a condition of contemporary existence. The question is not whether we imitate, but what our imitation reveals.
Study Questions and Answers
1. How does Timothy Touchett's attitude toward forgery evolve, and what does his "code" about not forging living authors reveal about his character?
Timothy begins by signing for deceased authors as a simple job, but he becomes absorbed in the artistry. His code shows he draws an ethical line: living authors can sign for themselves, while dead ones cannot. The exception for Paul Auster—because of Auster's own obsession with doubles and impostors—demonstrates Timothy's ability to rationalize. His code is both principled and self-serving, revealing a character who values artistic integrity even while committing fraud.
2. Compare Pushkin's authenticity in "The Line" with Irina's performance of ideology. Which character is more genuine, and why?
Pushkin is more genuine because his patience and generosity are consistent regardless of circumstance. He does not pretend to be a certain kind of person; he simply acts according to his nature. Irina adopts Bolshevik fervor as a new identity, but she abandons it when it no longer serves her comfort. Her performance lacks the consistency that defines authenticity.
3. What role does the DiDomenico fragment play in exploring the theme of fragmentation versus wholeness?
The fragment was cut from a unified painting to prevent its sale. Each piece is physically authentic but incomplete. The story uses the fragment to ask whether authenticity requires wholeness. Percy's attempt to profit from the fragment fails, but he gains a genuine family connection. The fragment symbolizes that sometimes a broken part can carry more meaning than the whole.
4. In "The Bootlegger," why does Mary keep the confiscated tape? What does the tape represent?
Mary keeps the tape because it represents a truth that cannot be openly discussed: Fein's love for his wife and his grief. The tape is technically a forgery (an unauthorized recording), but it is an authentic artifact of devotion. By keeping it, Mary preserves a moment of genuine human connection that the official rules could not accommodate.
5. How does the collection's structure—stories spanning different eras and settings—reinforce the theme of authenticity and forgery?
The variety of settings shows that the tension between genuine and imitation is universal across time and place. From revolutionary Russia to modern Manhattan to Hollywood, characters face similar dilemmas: whether to perform a role or reveal their true selves. The collection itself becomes a kind of forgery, blending fiction with historical figures and metafictional elements, challenging readers to question what is real.