The Soulmate Bond: Love and Connection in Good Spirits
In B.K. Borison’s Good Spirits, the theme of love and connection is not simply a romantic subplot—it is the central mechanism that redefines the very purpose of haunting. The novel argues that unfinished business is not a punishment but a magnetic pull toward a destined soulmate. The relationship between Harriet York and Nolan Callahan transforms the Ghost of Christmas Past trope into a love story that transcends death and time. This analysis traces the claim across three key plot moments, examines character and symbol connections, and addresses the complexities within this thematic assertion.
The Thematic Claim
The core claim of Good Spirits is that love—not guilt, not duty—is the force that binds a spirit to the mortal world. Nolan has spent over a century believing his continued existence as a ghost is a consequence of his reckless death. Yet the novel reveals that every ghostly assignment, every trip to the past, every uncanny coincidence was engineered to bring him into alignment with Harriet. Their connection is not a punishment; it is a reunion. This reframes haunting as an act of waiting for one’s true love, a purposeful deferral rather than an aimless wandering.
Tracing the Theme Across the Plot
1. First Encounters: From Skepticism to Intimacy
The theme begins to take shape in chapters one through four. When Nolan first appears in Harriet’s living room, she is defiant and skeptical. She demands proof and refuses to participate unless she can speak to his supervisor. Their dynamic is combative, but beneath it, small gestures of care emerge. In Chapter Four, Nolan brings Harriet a peppermint mocha—an act that shows he has been observing her preferences. Harriet, in turn, notices the dimples in his scruff and feels an involuntary attraction. Their banter is laced with a growing familiarity that neither can explain. This initial resistance-slowly-melting-into-trust establishes that their connection is not built on fear but on an inexplicable recognition.
2. The Revelation: Unfinished Business Is Harriet
The turning point comes in Chapter Thirty-Eight, where Isabella and Aunt Matilda reveal to Nolan that his unfinished business was never the compass—it was Harriet herself. The compass, the boat, the jam, the songs: all were engineered coincidences designed to bring them into the same time. Isabella explains that Nolan’s soul and Harriet’s soul were together in the beginning and are destined to be together in the end. This chapter explicitly reframes his entire afterlife as a purposeful wait for his true love. Nolan’s reaction—a mixture of anger, disbelief, and overwhelming hope—underscores the emotional weight of the revelation. He realizes that every moment of loneliness was a step toward this meeting.
3. The Resolution: Choosing Love Over Peace
In Chapter Thirty-Nine, Harriet blows out the candle Nolan left behind, believing he will not return. But Nolan reappears, having been given a choice: move on to peace or return to her. He chose her. This moment is the thematic climax: love is more powerful than the afterlife’s tranquility. Nolan’s return validates Harriet’s hope and resolves the central romantic arc. The novel ends with his promise to be with her every tomorrow, proving that their connection not only transcends death but actively defeats it.
Character and Symbol Connections
Characters
- Harriet York: Initially portrayed as timid and overlooked, Harriet grows into someone who stands her ground. Her relationship with Nolan gives her the courage to reconnect with her sister Samantha, as seen in the train memory and their later reconciliation. Samantha herself reflects a parallel struggle for connection—the sisters’ estrangement is healed through Harriet’s new-found bravery.
- Nolan Callahan: A weary ghost who has long believed his existence is a penance. His character arc moves from resignation to hope as he learns that his love for Harriet is the true purpose of his haunting.
- Aunt Matilda and Isabella: These two supernatural figures serve as guides and revealers. Matilda’s warmth and Isabella’s sternness both push Nolan toward the truth. Matilda’s presence in the waiting room and her jam-making tie directly to the symbols of connection.
- Sasha: Harriet’s store manager offers comic relief and a grounding presence, but also represents the everyday world that love must navigate. Her questioning about ghosts mirrors the reader’s own curiosity.
Symbols
- Compass: The compass that Nolan has long believed to be his unfinished business is actually a red herring. Its true significance is as a marker of direction—toward Harriet, not toward an object. It symbolizes the concept that love, not an earthly artifact, provides orientation.
- Mistletoe: In Chapter Twenty-Five, Harriet covers her shop in mistletoe after a magical kiss with Nolan. The mistletoe becomes a physical manifestation of their growing intimacy. Sasha’s wonder at its installation (using double-sided tape and holiday magic) emphasizes that love can sustain something fragile.
- Candle in the Window: The candle Harriet blows out in Chapter Thirty-Nine represents the hope she is ready to extinguish. When Nolan returns, the act is reversed: he becomes the light that stays lit. The candle symbolizes the fragile yet persistent nature of connection.
- Fig Jam: The jam that Harriet makes—the same recipe used by Nolan’s mother—represents a trans-temporal bond. It is a sensory link between his past and her present, a symbol that love can be tasted across generations.
Complexity and Contradiction
The thematic claim is not presented without tension. The novel acknowledges the pain of waiting, the fear of loss, and the possibility that love might not be enough. Harriet struggles with self-doubt: she worries she is “too soft” and that her feelings for a ghost will leave her heartbroken. In Chapter Twenty-Five, she reflects that she might forget Nolan once he disappears—a real consequence of his ghostly nature. The complexity lies in the contradiction between the joyful reunion and the decades of loneliness Nolan endured. Isabella calls Nolan “remarkably stupid” for not seeing the truth, but this stupidity is also a defense mechanism: hope hurts. Similarly, Harriet’s vulnerability is both a strength and a risk. The novel does not erase the pain of separation; it transforms it into a deeper appreciation for the moments they do have.
Study Questions
-
How does the novel redefine the concept of “unfinished business”?
Answer: Unfinished business is not a task but a person. Nolan’s afterlife was not about finding a compass but about aligning his soul with Harriet’s. The ghostly rules—trips to the past, engineered coincidences—were all mechanisms to bring them together. -
What role does the character of Aunt Matilda play in advancing the theme of love and connection?
Answer: Aunt Matilda is a bridge between the living and the dead. She appears in the waiting room to reveal the truth to Nolan, and her presence in Harriet’s life (through the antiques shop and the fig jam) reinforces the idea that love can be passed down and remembered. -
How does Harriet’s relationship with her sister Samantha mirror her relationship with Nolan?
Answer: Both relationships require Harriet to stand her ground and trust in connection. With Samantha, she must forgive and reach out; with Nolan, she must believe in something beyond the visible. The parallel is emphasized in the train memory, where the sisters’ bond is shown as pure and unbroken. -
In what ways does the symbol of the candle in the window support the thematic resolution?
Answer: The candle represents Harriet’s hope. When she blows it out, she accepts loss. Nolan’s return rekindles that hope, showing that love can reignite even after it seems extinguished. The candle becomes a literal and figurative light in the darkness. -
What contradiction does the novel present about the necessity of choice versus fate in love?
Answer: The novel suggests that fate (soulmate design) and choice (Nolan’s decision to return) coexist. Although the souls are destined, Nolan must actively choose Harriet over peace. This contradiction emphasizes that love requires both cosmic alignment and personal agency.