Aging and the Passing of an Era in Between Two Kings
The final installment of Lawrence Ellsworth’s Musketeers Cycle translation, Between Two Kings, does not simply chronicle Charles II’s restoration; it buries the youthful world of the four friends beneath the weight of time. Ellsworth (Dumas) crafts a novel in which the four musketeers—d’Artagnan, Athos, Porthos, and Aramis—are no longer the inseparable swordsmen who laughed at danger. They are middle‑aged men dispersed across estates and bishoprics, their bonds frayed, their bodies softened, and their heroic identity unraveling. The novel’s central thematic claim is that the passage of time not only ages the body, but also renders obsolete the very code of chivalric brotherhood that once defined a generation. The old era of individual, selfless adventure is ending, supplanted by a colder, more bureaucratic age of kings, ministers, and ledgers. This theme resonates across three distinct arcs: the melancholy reunion of Athos and d’Artagnan, the symbolic decline of Porthos and the missing comrades, and the rise of Louis XIV who relegates the aging hero to a relic.
“Eleven Years Ago! It Seems Like a Century”: Memory as Loss
When Athos and d’Artagnan meet again at the Hartshorn Inn, the novel stages a miniature of the entire passing of an era. The inn has changed: the common room is now a warehouse, the musketeers’ former host a merchant. The physical space mirrors the transformation of their lives. D’Artagnan, recognizing the woodwork and the map that Porthos once studied, says, “Eleven years ago! … Mordioux! It seems like a century.” Athos contradicts him softly: “And to me but a day.” This divergence exposes the core complexity: aging is both a slow erosion and a sudden shock. Athos, who has retreated to the serenity of his estate and the mentorship of Raoul, measures time by continuity; d’Artagnan, adrift without a master after resigning from Louis XIV’s service, measures it by loss.
The scene also dismantles the myth of eternal camaraderie. Athos’s joy is conditional: “this joy could only be greater if our two friends were here… with Raoul… regarding us with his eyes, so brilliant and so sweet!” The hypothetical perfection, spoken in the conditional, emphasizes that the quartet is irrevocably broken. Athos and d’Artagnan talk of the past, but they no longer live in it. The aging process has turned them into solitary men who reminisce rather than act together. Their earlier selflessness—d’Artagnan’s secret financing of the king’s restoration, Athos’s preservation of the Newcastle treasure for honor’s sake—now feels like a vestigial reflex from a bygone code, not a shared venture. The theme thus admits contradiction: these men are still capable of great exploits (they just restored a king), yet the novel mourns the end of collective heroic adventure. They are heroes in isolation, and that isolation is the mark of their age.
The “Equinox” and the Disappearing Colossus
The erosion of community is even starker in the fate of Porthos. When d’Artagnan goes to Pierrefonds seeking his friend, he finds only Mousqueton. Porthos has vanished after receiving a cryptic letter from Aramis: “Dear Porthos, depart now if you want to get here before the Equinox.” Porthos, ever literal and guileless, races off to beat this mysterious “Equinox,” a figure he imagines as a rival with superior horses. The comedy is laced with tragedy: the strongest of the four is now a solitary giant pulled into an ambiguous scheme by the most secretive among them. The scene underlines how the old bonds have curdled into manipulation. Aramis uses the language of urgency and adventure—an echo of their past—but the mission is not for king or country; it is a shadowy episcopal intrigue. The camaraderie of equals has been replaced by an asymmetrical relationship in which the aging Porthos is a tool, not a partner.
This episode also deepens the motif of physical diminishment. D’Artagnan, upon leaving Pierrefonds, succumbs to a monologue that is the novel’s most explicit meditation on mortality. He thinks, “No friends, no future, no nothing! With the loss of my old comrades goes the last of my strength! Old age creeps up on us, cold and inexorable, wrapping in its funereal crepe all that was brilliant and capable in youth, then throws that burden over its shoulder and carries it to the bottomless abyss of death.” The imagery of burial—a shroud, a grave, a shovel’s dirt—makes aging not a natural maturity but a funeral procession. The novel argues that the passing of an era is not merely chronological; it is the extinction of a shared vitality. Porthos’s absence is the void where that vitality once roared. And unlike earlier adventures, this one yields no glory. The symbol of the mysterious ledger and the stealthy treasure hint at a new world of finance and state secrets, where brute strength has no place.
The New King and the Obsolete Soldier: Louis XIV’s Ascendancy
If Athos and Porthos embody the dying era from the private sphere, the confrontation between Louis XIV and d’Artagnan marks the public, formal transfer of power from old swords to new systems. In Chapter XIV, d’Artagnan requests his discharge from the young king’s service, complaining that he is old, stiff, and out of step with the new court. Louis, who has just been humiliated by his dependence on Cardinal Mazarin, refuses the resignation and forces d’Artagnan to confess the real reason: he feels forgotten and undervalued. The exchange is a battle of two ages. D’Artagnan, speaking “the bitter gall I’ve amassed over thirty years,” lists his heroic deeds under Louis XIII and Richelieu, his service during the Fronde. But those battles belong to a past that the absolutist young king neither shared nor respects. Louis concedes only that he remembers d’Artagnan as the man who guarded his childhood bed with a drawn sword—a memory of personal loyalty, not of military glory. The king then coldly grants the discharge, declaring, “You are free.”
That scene’s language encodes the novel’s judgment. Louis’s “cold sweat” and hoarse sob show that even he is ambivalent about discarding the old model of service. But the state he is building cannot afford a servant who expects gratitude or who operates on a code of honor rather than salary and rank. The final shift occurs in Chapter L, after Mazarin’s death. Louis, flanked by Colbert’s ledger‑based intelligence and the physical treasure now vaulted in the Louvre, recalls d’Artagnan not as a friend but as a “loyal sword.” The king explicitly decides he requires both “brains and brawn”—a calculation, not a bond. The aging warrior is reabsorbed into the state machine, but only as a tool. The era when a musketeer could personally shape a king’s conscience is over.
Symbols of a Vanishing World: Coffins, Treasures, and Diamonds
The novel’s symbolic inventory reinforces this theme through objects that are either hidden, stolen, or interred. The ventilated‑box coffin in which d’Artagnan transports Monck literalizes the death of the old revolutionary order and its ghoulish rebirth as a restored monarchy. That coffin, a masterpiece of black humor, also functions as a metaphor for the condition of the musketeers themselves: they are still breathing, still capable, but boxed into an age that requires their subterfuge rather than their heroism. The Newcastle treasure, entrusted to Athos by the martyred Charles I, represents a sacred obligation passed from the dead to the living, but its ultimate use—funding a restored Charles II—makes it a legacy that extinguishes itself. Once the treasure is spent, the mission that defined Athos’s later life evaporates. Similarly, Mazarin’s ledger and the diamond symbolize the shift from chivalric gift‑giving to state accounting. Wealth is no longer a token of favor but a line item in a minister’s secret book. The diamond that once might have adorned a queen’s favor now sits in a duke’s inventory, its glitter a reminder that the new era measures value in columns of figures, not in grand gestures. These symbols collectively argue that the material legacy of the past—treasure, jewels, even the king’s gold—is being digested by an impersonal bureaucracy, leaving nothing for the aging heroes but memories.
Complexity and Contradiction: The Heroism That Refuses to Die
Ellsworth’s version of this Dumas text does not treat the passing of the era as pure tragedy. It remains a novel of adventure, and even old men perform one last great exploit. The thematic complexity lies in the simultaneous affirmation and negation of enduring heroism. Athos tells d’Artagnan that he served Charles II not for gratitude but out of a selfless duty to honor; d’Artagnan himself, despite his cynicism, is moved to say that “selflessness is the finest thing in the world.” The novel suggests that the internal code can survive even as the external world rejects it. Yet this survival is lonely and anachronistic. The pathos of d’Artagnan’s receipt of a forgotten royal audience and a belated ship‑home is that it only underscores his status as a relic. No amount of gold (Planchet’s investment, the English reward) can buy back his place at the center of history. The final irony is that Louis XIV will recall him—but only because Colbert has shown the king that he needs a weapon. The era of the musketeers thus passes into a world where the old hero is resurrected not as a companion but as an instrument of the modern state.
Study Questions and Answers
-
What is the novel’s primary claim about aging and the heroic code?
The novel claims that aging destroys the collective, selfless camaraderie that defined the musketeers’ youth, replacing it with isolation, physical decline, and an increasingly bureaucratic world that renders chivalric adventure obsolete. -
How does the Hartshorn Inn scene illustrate the disconnection between Athos and d’Artagnan?
The inn’s transformation from a tavern to a warehouse mirrors their changed lives. D’Artagnan feels the past as a century ago, while Athos perceives it as only a day, revealing divergent relationships with memory and loss. The absent Porthos and Aramis underscore the dissolution of the quartet. -
In what way does Porthos’s departure for the “Equinox” symbolize the end of an era?
Porthos’s literal‑minded chase after a mysterious rival shows how the most physically powerful musketeer is now used as a pawn by Aramis, not a brother‑in‑arms. The scene highlights how old bonds have decayed into manipulation, and physical strength is misdirected toward obscure goals rather than shared glory. -
How does Louis XIV’s treatment of d’Artagnan mark the transition from an old world to a new one?
Louis initially lets d’Artagnan resign, then recalls him only after Mazarin’s death as a “loyal sword.” The king discards the model of personal loyalty and honor in favor of calculating, bureaucratic rule. D’Artagnan becomes a tool rather than a trusted knight, signifying the end of the chivalric era. -
Why are symbols like the ventilated coffin and Mazarin’s ledger essential to the aging theme?
The coffin literalizes the death of the old order and the entombment of vitality. The ledger represents the shift from personal favor and treasure‑as‑gift to state accounting and secrecy. Both show that the material and moral worlds of the musketeers are being replaced by an impersonal, financialized modernity.